Optimizing Out-of-the-Box Quality Solutions and Customization
Veeva Systems Inc
/@VeevaSystems
Published: May 16, 2022
Insights
This analysis focuses on the strategic implementation of an Electronic Quality Management System (eQMS) within the highly regulated pharmaceutical sector, specifically addressing the trade-offs between leveraging out-of-the-box solutions and pursuing extensive customization. The discussion, featuring insights from Forge Biologics, highlights how early-stage life sciences companies can utilize modern platforms, likely Veeva Quality Suite products, to accelerate operations while maintaining strict regulatory compliance.
The core theme revolves around minimizing system customization to achieve speed and agility in a GxP environment. The speaker, representing Forge Biologics (a startup founded around 2020), explains that their lack of pre-established, paper-based processes was a significant advantage. Unlike established organizations facing complex data migration and process conversion challenges, Forge was able to adopt the eQMS solution largely using its default, out-of-the-box configuration. This approach required only minor, non-impactful changes to the standard configuration.
The strategic rationale for avoiding significant customization is explicitly tied to the time and effort required for system validation. In the pharmaceutical industry, validating an entire electronic system (e.g., meeting 21 CFR Part 11 requirements) is a rigorous and time-consuming process. By sticking closely to the vendor’s validated base configuration, Forge Biologics drastically reduced the scope and complexity of their own validation activities. This streamlined, fast implementation approach is crucial for a startup whose ultimate goal is to accelerate the timeline for bringing therapies to market quickly. The speaker emphasizes that this agility is achieved without compromising the fundamental quality standards required by regulatory bodies.
This case study underscores a critical methodology for regulated software deployment: prioritizing speed and compliance by leveraging the inherent regulatory design of industry-specific platforms. For new or rapidly scaling biotechs, the ability to implement a robust quality system quickly—avoiding the pitfalls of extensive custom coding that necessitates comprehensive re-validation—is a key competitive differentiator. The approach demonstrates a successful strategy for balancing operational expediency with the stringent demands of pharmaceutical quality manufacturing.
Key Takeaways:
- Validation Efficiency through Standardization: The primary benefit of using out-of-the-box eQMS solutions is the significant reduction in validation effort and time. Customization introduces complexity that requires extensive re-validation, potentially delaying system deployment and increasing compliance costs substantially.
- Startup Advantage in System Adoption: New organizations or startups (like Forge Biologics) are uniquely positioned to adopt modern, streamlined quality systems because they do not carry the burden of migrating legacy data or converting deeply entrenched, paper-based processes, allowing for faster implementation cycles.
- Agility as a Commercial Driver: Strategic system implementation is directly linked to commercial success; a rapid, streamlined deployment of the QMS enables the organization to be more agile, supporting the overarching goal of accelerating time-to-market for new therapies.
- Minimizing Customization Risk: Consultants should advise clients that any change impacting the core functionality or data integrity of a regulated system must be carefully assessed for its effect on validation. Minor configuration changes are acceptable, but significant customization should be avoided unless absolutely necessary for a unique, validated process.
- Leveraging Vendor Expertise: The success of the out-of-the-box strategy relies on the quality solution (likely Veeva) being designed from the ground up to meet standard industry regulatory requirements (e.g., GxP, 21 CFR Part 11), thereby shifting the initial validation burden to the vendor.
- Phased Customization Approach: For clients needing bespoke functionality, the best practice is to implement the standardized system first to gain immediate compliance and operational benefits, then introduce customization incrementally in later phases once core processes are stable and validated.
- Data Migration Complexity: Organizations converting from paper or legacy systems must anticipate that data migration will be a major bottleneck and challenge, requiring specialized data engineering and validation services—a stark contrast to the startup experience described.
- Strategic System Selection: The selection process for the eQMS tool must prioritize solutions that offer robust, industry-specific configurations that align closely with standard GxP best practices, minimizing the perceived need for extensive bespoke development.
Tools/Resources Mentioned:
- eQMS System (Electronic Quality Management System): The core regulated software platform discussed, likely a product from the Veeva Quality Suite (e.g., Veeva QualityDocs, Veeva QMS).
- Veeva Systems Inc: The channel hosting the discussion, confirming the context within the Veeva ecosystem, which is a key focus area for IntuitionLabs.ai.
Key Concepts:
- System Validation: The process of ensuring that a computerized system (like an eQMS) accurately and consistently performs its intended functions in a regulated environment, adhering to standards like GxP and 21 CFR Part 11. Customization significantly complicates and extends the validation timeline.
- Out-of-the-Box Solution: Utilizing the standard, pre-configured functionality of a software system with minimal changes. In regulated industries, this approach is favored as the vendor typically provides documentation supporting the initial validation of the standard configuration.
- Speed and Agility: The ability of a life sciences company to rapidly implement necessary operational systems and processes, which is critical for accelerating clinical trials, manufacturing scale-up, and ultimately, market entry for new therapies.