How to plan a life science eQMS implementation
Qualio
/@QualioHQ
Published: August 22, 2022
Insights
The video offers an expert perspective on the critical planning phase for implementing an electronic Quality Management System (eQMS) within the life sciences sector. The central thesis is that successful digitization of quality processes is predicated on a deep, pre-implementation understanding of the company's future state, or "2b processes." This initial step requires the regulated company to thoroughly map out its product life cycle—the sequence of activities necessary to deliver a quality product to the patient—and ensure the eQMS is selected and configured specifically to support defined GxP processes. The system is explicitly viewed not as an isolated technology, but as an integrated component supporting regulatory compliance.
Defining the system requirements is presented as a complex synthesis of four knowledge domains: inherent product knowledge, detailed process knowledge, necessary regulatory knowledge (i.e., the basic compliance achievements required), and the company’s internal quality standards. The speaker highlights that many regulated companies struggle with this definition phase due to a lack of internal expertise or resources, particularly in mapping complex data flows and identifying process-level risks. This gap creates a crucial opportunity for specialized service providers, integrators, and consultants to assist in translating operational needs into clear, actionable system requirements.
The role of the service provider extends beyond mere requirement gathering; it involves a transparent mapping exercise. The provider must clearly communicate to the regulated company which requirements are natively built into the product, which can be satisfied through system configuration, and which will necessitate custom development or cannot be met at all. This clear communication is essential for the regulated company to understand the necessary operational procedure changes and verify that the new application—whether a cloud-based Software as a Service (SaaS) or an on-premise solution—will be compliant and risk-managed. Ultimately, the speaker emphasizes that successful eQMS deployment requires significant effort from both the regulated company and the service provider, leveraging external expertise to overcome internal resource limitations and ensure regulatory adherence.
Key Takeaways: • Prioritize "2b" Process Definition: The foundational step for eQMS implementation is understanding the desired future state processes, including the entire product life cycle and how the system will specifically support necessary GxP activities. • Integrate Four Knowledge Pillars: System requirements must be defined by synthesizing product knowledge, detailed process understanding, core regulatory compliance requirements, and the company’s specific internal quality standards. • Analyze Data Flows and Process Risks: A critical component of process understanding involves mapping data flows related to the GxP processes and identifying and managing any associated risks at the process level before system selection. • External Expertise is Essential: Regulated companies often lack the internal skills or resources to adequately define complex system requirements; service providers and consultants are vital partners in helping them articulate and formalize these needs. • Service Providers Must Map Requirements Transparently: Consultants should categorize requirements into three clear groups for the client: those built-in to the product, those met through configuration, and those requiring custom development, ensuring clarity on implementation effort. • Focus on Compliance Demonstration: The service provider must simply and clearly demonstrate to the regulated company how the proposed solution, combined with updated operational procedures, will meet all defined requirements, manage risks, and ensure regulatory compliance. • Resource Constraints Drive Outsourcing: Internal experts in regulated companies are typically spread thin across multiple projects, making the engagement of specialized external integrators a necessity rather than a luxury for timely and compliant system deployment. • System Selection is Process-Driven: The eQMS system must be selected based on its ability to support specific GxP processes, reinforcing the idea that the technology serves the regulated process, not the other way around. • Configuration Maximization: Service providers should prioritize meeting requirements through system configuration over custom work, as configuration is generally easier to validate and maintain within a regulated environment.
Key Concepts:
- 2b Processes: The desired, optimized state of business processes following the implementation of the new system (eQMS).
- GxP Process: An umbrella term for regulated quality practices (e.g., GMP, GCP) that require strict adherence and documentation, which the eQMS must support.
- Regulated Company: An organization operating in the life sciences sector (e.g., pharma, biotech) subject to stringent regulatory oversight (e.g., FDA, EMA).
- eQMS (Electronic Quality Management System): A digital system designed to manage quality processes, documentation, training, and compliance within a regulated industry.