TMF/eTMF Regulatory Agency Expectations, Inspections, and Findings

Kathy Barnett

/@kathybarnett4070

Published: November 21, 2020

Open in YouTube
Insights

This video provides an in-depth exploration of regulatory expectations, inspections, and findings related to Trial Master Files (TMF) and electronic Trial Master Files (eTMF) in clinical investigations. Presented by Donna Dorinsky, a recognized subject matter expert in TMF and inspection readiness and a member of the TMF reference model steering committee, the session aims to equip participants with strategies for maintaining regulatory compliance and preparing for successful outcomes during TMF inspections. The overarching goal is to ensure that pharmaceutical companies are fully prepared from a TMF perspective when seeking regulatory approval for new drugs, emphasizing that the TMF is the complete narrative of a study.

The presentation delves into the critical role of the TMF, describing it as "the story of your study"—a standalone set of documentation that should clearly articulate the entire trial without requiring extensive external explanation. Dorinsky shares a compelling anecdote about an FDA inspection where a meticulously remediated TMF led to an inspector concluding the TMF was in "excellent shape" after just three days, requiring minimal interaction with clinical personnel. This experience underscores the ideal state where the TMF itself provides a comprehensive and assessable record, enabling evaluation of trial conduct, data integrity, and compliance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP) standards. It is highlighted that the TMF represents a collective output of information from all functional areas involved in a study.

A significant portion of the discussion focuses on essential documents, as defined by ICH E6, which are crucial for assessing trial conduct, data quality, and compliance with GCP. The video specifically references the 2016 revision, ICH E6 R2 (Integrated Addendum), which clarified expectations around TMF management. A key takeaway from this revision is the explicit requirement for both the sponsor and the investigator to maintain a record of the locations of their respective essential documents. Dorinsky emphasizes that regulatory bodies like the EMA and ICH consider the TMF to be comprised of documentation held by both the sponsor and the investigator (including site files). The speaker also addresses a practical challenge: even with the adoption of eTMF systems, it is rare for 100% of all essential documents to be consolidated in one single, human-readable format within a single system.

Key Takeaways:

  • TMF as the Study Narrative: The Trial Master File (TMF) is fundamentally "the story of your study," serving as a standalone, comprehensive collection of documentation that should clearly explain the entire clinical trial without needing additional context. Its primary purpose is to ensure readiness for regulatory approval.
  • Regulatory Inspection Readiness: A well-maintained TMF is crucial for successful regulatory inspections. The speaker shared an experience where a highly organized TMF significantly streamlined an FDA inspection, demonstrating the power of a complete and accessible record.
  • Core Functions of TMF: The TMF enables the assessment of trial conduct, the evaluation of the integrity of trial data, and verification of compliance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP) standards, making it indispensable for regulatory oversight.
  • Collective Effort: The TMF is a collective output of information contributed by all functional areas involved in a clinical study, highlighting the need for cross-functional collaboration and standardized processes.
  • Essential Documents Defined by ICH E6: Essential documents, as defined in ICH E6, are those that individually and collectively permit the evaluation of trial conduct, data quality, and compliance of investigators, sponsors, and monitors with GCP standards.
  • ICH E6 R2 Updates on TMF: The 2016 ICH E6 R2 (Integrated Addendum) clarified that both the sponsor and the investigator are required to maintain a record of the locations of their respective essential documents, underscoring shared responsibility.
  • Dual TMF Ownership: Regulatory bodies like the EMA and ICH explicitly state that the TMF encompasses documentation held by both the sponsor and the investigator (including investigator site files), emphasizing a broader scope for TMF management.
  • Challenges with eTMF Consolidation: A practical challenge in TMF management is that even with electronic TMF (eTMF) systems, it is uncommon for 100% of all essential documents to be located and consolidated in a single, human-readable format within one system.
  • Proactive CAPA Planning: The presentation encourages participants to identify potential regulatory findings related to TMF and proactively develop Corrective and Preventive Action (CAPA) plans to address these issues, leading to successful inspection outcomes.
  • Importance of Location Tracking: Given that TMF documents may reside in multiple locations, maintaining an accurate record of where essential documents are held is a critical regulatory expectation.

Tools/Resources Mentioned:

  • TMF Reference Model: A standardized, hierarchical model for classifying and organizing TMF documents, which the speaker is a steering committee member of.
  • ICH E6 (R2) Integrated Addendum: International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, Guideline for Good Clinical Practice, Revision 2.

Key Concepts:

  • Trial Master File (TMF): A collection of essential documents that individually and collectively permit the evaluation of the conduct of a clinical trial, the quality of the data produced, and the adherence to regulatory requirements.
  • Electronic Trial Master File (eTMF): A digital system for managing and storing TMF documents.
  • Good Clinical Practice (GCP): An international ethical and scientific quality standard for designing, conducting, recording, and reporting trials that involve the participation of human subjects.
  • Corrective and Preventive Actions (CAPA): A system for identifying, documenting, and resolving non-conformances or deviations, and preventing their recurrence.
  • Essential Documents: Documents that permit the evaluation of the conduct of a trial and the quality of the data.
  • Sponsor: The individual, company, institution, or organization that takes responsibility for the initiation, management, and/or financing of a clinical trial.
  • Investigator: The person responsible for the conduct of the clinical trial at a trial site.
  • Inspection Readiness: The state of being prepared for regulatory inspections by ensuring all documentation and processes are compliant and accessible.

Examples/Case Studies:

  • FDA TMF Inspection Anecdote: The speaker recounted an experience where nine months of work to remediate a TMF resulted in an FDA inspector declaring the TMF in "excellent shape" after just three days of a four-day inspection, requiring minimal interaction with clinical personnel. This highlights the effectiveness of a well-prepared TMF in streamlining regulatory reviews.