Health Insurance Middlemen: How the Network Effect Makes Them So Powerful

AHealthcareZ - Healthcare Finance Explained

@ahealthcarez

Published: October 11, 2023

Open in YouTube
Insights

This video provides an in-depth exploration of the significant financial growth and market power wielded by publicly traded health insurance carriers, particularly since the passage of the Affordable Care Act in 2010. Dr. Eric Bricker, a healthcare finance expert, begins by highlighting the extraordinary stock performance of major health insurance groups like UnitedHealth Group, Anthem (now Elevance), Cigna, and CVS (which owns Aetna). He notes that their growth rates have often surpassed those of tech giants like Apple and the overall market, prompting the central question of whether this profitability comes at the expense of doctors and other healthcare providers.

The core of Dr. Bricker's analysis centers on the "network effect" as the fundamental driver of these companies' power. He explains that health insurance companies function primarily as financial intermediaries, facilitating transactions between the ultimate payers (governments and employers) and the care providers (doctors and hospitals). They prefer to be known as "health care services companies" because their primary service is managing these financial flows within the $4.3 trillion American healthcare system. The network effect dictates that the value and power of an insurance company's network increase exponentially as more participants—doctors, hospitals, governments, and employers—join it, creating a powerful, self-reinforcing cycle of market dominance.

Dr. Bricker draws strong historical parallels, comparing the current power of health insurance networks to that of 19th-century railway "robber barons" and 1980s/90s cable television monopolies. In both historical instances, entrenched networks leveraged their power to charge exorbitant fees and provide notoriously poor service. He argues that health insurance networks today operate similarly, characterized by high costs and generally unsatisfactory customer service. However, he also identifies the inherent weakness of such powerful networks: they become vulnerable to "disintermediation" or disruption when their costs become too high or their service quality deteriorates significantly. This disruption, he posits, is typically enabled by innovation—whether regulatory, technological, or a combination thereof—allowing new models to bypass the incumbent network, much like streaming services disrupted cable TV or cars and planes circumvented railways.

The video concludes by asserting that healthcare is now at the cusp of such a disintermediation phase. The "health services companies" have become excessively expensive and provide inadequate services, spurring innovative minds, including doctors themselves, to seek alternative approaches. Dr. Bricker advocates for "direct contracting" as a key strategy, where doctors and healthcare providers contract directly with governments and employers, thereby bypassing traditional health insurance networks. He specifically recommends exploring Nomi Health's open network as a resource for providers looking to adopt this model, emphasizing that the goal is to cut through administrative red tape, ensure fair compensation, and ultimately refocus on patient care.

Detailed Key Takeaways:

  • Health Insurance Carriers' Unprecedented Financial Growth: Major health insurance companies have demonstrated exceptional stock price growth (e.g., UnitedHealth Group's 26% annual growth since 2010), significantly outperforming the broader market and even leading tech companies. This highlights their immense profitability within the healthcare ecosystem.
  • Role as Financial Intermediaries: Health insurance companies function primarily as financial middlemen, connecting payers (governments, employers) with providers (doctors, hospitals). They position themselves as "health care services companies" to reflect their role in facilitating financial transactions rather than merely insuring against risk.
  • The Dominance of the Network Effect: The core of health insurers' power stems from the network effect; their influence and value grow exponentially as more healthcare providers and payers join their networks, creating a powerful barrier to entry and competition.
  • Historical Precedents of Network Exploitation: The video likens current health insurance networks to historical monopolies like 19th-century railways and cable television, which similarly leveraged network power to impose high prices and offer poor service, illustrating a recurring pattern of market dominance leading to exploitation.
  • High Costs and Poor Service in Healthcare: The current healthcare system, dominated by powerful insurance networks, is characterized by exorbitant fees and generally poor customer service, leading to widespread frustration among patients and providers alike.
  • Vulnerability to Disintermediation: Powerful networks, despite their strength, possess an Achilles' heel: they become susceptible to "disintermediation" when their costs become too high or their service quality becomes unacceptable, prompting stakeholders to seek alternative solutions.
  • Innovation as the Driver of Disruption: Disintermediation is typically catalyzed by innovation—whether regulatory, technological, or a combination—which enables new models or players to bypass existing, entrenched networks, as seen with streaming services disrupting cable TV.
  • Emerging Disruption in Healthcare Finance: The healthcare sector is currently experiencing the beginnings of disintermediation, driven by the unsustainability of high costs and poor services offered by traditional "health services companies."
  • Direct Contracting as a Strategic Alternative: Doctors and healthcare providers are increasingly adopting "direct contracting" models, where they contract directly with governments and employers, bypassing traditional insurance networks to regain financial autonomy and streamline care delivery.
  • Nomi Health as a Recommended Resource: Nomi Health's open network is specifically mentioned as a viable resource for doctors and providers interested in exploring and implementing direct contracting strategies to challenge the traditional insurance model.
  • Refocusing on Patient Care: A key motivation for pursuing disintermediation and direct contracting is to reduce administrative burdens, ensure fair compensation for providers, and ultimately allow healthcare professionals to dedicate more resources and focus on delivering quality patient care.

Tools/Resources Mentioned:

  • Nomi Health's Open Network: A platform/resource for doctors and healthcare providers to learn about and engage in direct contracting. (nomihealth.com/blog/healthcare-uncovered-episode-18-disintermediation-is-finally-coming-to-big-healthcare/)

Key Concepts:

  • Network Effect: The principle that the value of a product or service increases with the number of users. In healthcare, this refers to the growing power and influence of health insurance companies as more providers and payers join their networks.
  • Financial Intermediaries: Entities that facilitate financial transactions between two parties. Health insurance companies act as intermediaries between those who fund healthcare (employers, government) and those who provide it (doctors, hospitals).
  • Disintermediation: The process of removing intermediaries from a supply chain or transaction. In healthcare, this refers to efforts to bypass traditional health insurance companies to establish direct relationships between payers and providers.
  • Direct Contracting: A healthcare delivery model where providers contract directly with employers, government entities, or other organizations to provide services, circumventing traditional health insurance networks.

Examples/Case Studies:

  • Stock Performance of Major Health Insurers (2010-Present):
    • UnitedHealth Group: $32 to over $500 per share (26% annual growth).
    • Anthem (now Elevance): $51 to $520 per share.
    • Cigna: $31 to $272 per share.
    • CVS (owns Aetna): $27 to $98 per share.
  • Historical Network Monopolies:
    • 19th-century Railways and "Robber Barons": Demonstrated immense network power leading to exploitation.
    • Cable Television (1980s-early 2000s): Characterized by strong network power, high prices, and poor service.
  • Examples of Disintermediation:
    • Streaming services (Netflix, Hulu, Apple+): Disrupted the cable TV industry by offering direct-to-consumer content.
    • Planes, cars, and trucks: Provided alternatives to the railway network, enabling new forms of transportation and logistics.